{"id":"W2012525493","doi":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.01.004","title":"The assessment of mathematical literacy of linguistic minority students: Results of a multi-method investigation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Mathematical Behavior","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of British Columbia; University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Differential item functioning; Psychology; Test (biology); Mathematics education; Literacy; Think aloud protocol; Language proficiency; Language assessment; Pedagogy; Item response theory; Developmental psychology; Computer science; Psychometrics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01334473,0.0001410583,0.0005549676,0.00007990074,0.0001437222,0.00005578959,0.001031721,0.000091152,0.00003764532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005022872,0.00007614056,0.0001957008,0.000288695,0.0007024932,0.000144209,0.0001525554,0.00030142,0.000003704575],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009251833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003378928,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005594912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001441535,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949042,0.001027745,0.001705101,0.00009415949,0.002045362,0.0002234988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931171,0.00340155,0.001683182,0.0003290865,0.001288138,0.0001809348],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001130606,0.01414469,0.198325,0.0009733897,0.0008105956,0.0000374374,0.4960099,0.00004643721,0.01153449,0.2674979,0.001836977,0.00765253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01863658,0.00463657,0.4968069,0.003483332,0.007590387,0.0001198727,0.1388191,0.005439709,0.008808947,0.3133661,0.001172683,0.001119814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877741,0.00009670506,0.00830119,0.0006933635,0.0002414406,0.0006063661,0.00001190348,0.000008157875,0.002266764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9368337,0.00003495575,0.06258132,0.00001031699,0.0001159518,0.000007896837,7.107888e-7,0.000009441724,0.0004056921],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3571908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.601321,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1090313622605751,"score_gpt":0.4817575674014773,"score_spread":0.3727262051409022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}