{"id":"W2012585456","doi":"10.1080/02255189.2014.877877","title":"The bureaucratic performance of development in colonial and post-colonial Tanzania","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement","topic":"Urban and Rural Development Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Legitimacy; Bureaucracy; Ambivalence; Tanzania; Politics; Colonialism; Political science; Poverty; Political economy; Colonial period; Development economics; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Social psychology; Economics; Socioeconomics; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004782245,0.0006254368,0.001139091,0.0006353536,0.001993056,0.0001199871,0.0009495998,0.0002678513,0.00008086845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008760578,0.0005374209,0.0001171078,0.0008162584,0.00139196,0.0003340706,0.0001732119,0.0005714291,0.00001731924],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005585189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01197356,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01386158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9296048,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994551,0.0004169625,0.002265645,0.0004892605,0.0004615147,0.001815615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952753,0.0005599386,0.001109227,0.0002416625,0.00138948,0.001424441],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000300541,0.0002883307,0.1373827,0.001367881,0.002696929,0.0004461335,0.5833542,0.0001218274,0.00008787554,0.06506648,0.005137454,0.2037497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001862381,0.000829583,0.3670518,0.002301443,0.0001358669,0.0001216431,0.01741509,0.00004652113,0.0002071882,0.0004354392,0.6086605,0.0009325951],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9226205,0.01589856,0.000006806327,0.0556205,0.004689105,0.0006185701,0.000009397255,0.000007070174,0.0005294714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842615,0.009947865,0.002697592,0.0004349774,0.0004339424,0.00005278106,0.000006367505,0.00004428464,0.002120718],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9157433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997078,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03594806380076239,"score_gpt":0.2437345565024217,"score_spread":0.2077864927016593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}