{"id":"W2012745476","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00674.x","title":"CHALLENGING THE RHETORIC OF CHOICE IN PRENATAL SCREENING","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Bioethics","topic":"Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Worry; Prenatal screening; Medicine; Context (archaeology); Prenatal care; Informed consent; Beneficence; Family medicine; Appeal; Value (mathematics); Prenatal diagnosis; Scope (computer science); Pregnancy; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Psychiatry; Political science; Law; Population; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008018799,0.0003971688,0.000963786,0.001972141,0.0008679492,0.002276813,0.00107126,0.003694634,0.0009028642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01115602,0.0003393029,0.0004098524,0.002700228,0.00960835,0.005650877,0.001884234,0.005796401,0.0004771784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002877987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004941616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00411396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005816559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946945,0.003539711,0.0002510705,0.0002038214,0.001198172,0.0001127448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890893,0.009926002,0.0003166652,0.0001336138,0.0004392572,0.00009514245],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004238863,0.00002630552,0.0003107618,0.01002906,0.00007468476,0.0006704378,0.003917166,0.0004247311,0.000334281,0.3213874,0.04553795,0.6172448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002218492,0.00004117379,0.0008180347,0.01604363,0.00005116553,0.002539648,0.001707441,0.0001581659,0.0003184577,0.07232657,0.9059399,0.00003362549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000152034,0.9891043,0.0002958427,0.007847209,0.0003227723,0.000001792569,0.000001270707,0.000002280519,0.00227256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005899922,0.9877379,0.0003732048,0.004856377,0.0005307314,0.000007922021,0.000003442621,0.00000299624,0.0005876138],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008018799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04240799,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2054657736207244,"score_gpt":0.4095772723354464,"score_spread":0.204111498714722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}