{"id":"W2012940687","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.06.006","title":"Inferring profiles of energy fluxes within a soybean canopy using Lagrangian analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","topic":"Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences","keywords":"Canopy; Environmental science; Biometeorology; Lagrangian; Atmospheric sciences; Meteorology; Mathematics; Geography; Physics; Ecology; Biology; Applied mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006111262,0.0001010255,0.0001825797,0.0000554001,0.00007727688,0.00001156042,0.00007123984,0.00007232654,0.00004010893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002955474,0.00006029764,0.00006376224,0.000347101,0.00011927,0.00009682952,0.00006531229,0.00004529489,0.000001710791],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002141892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002453874,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0104645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02168302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993575,0.00003423882,0.0001919485,0.0001667206,0.000087395,0.0001621892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999772,0.00001897059,0.00009795096,0.0000664297,0.000007685508,0.00003693059],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006651443,0.00002129881,0.8733734,0.000002726633,0.00007889023,0.000003082889,0.00008120799,0.08343095,0.03848073,0.004416177,0.00001439233,0.00009050145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001256266,0.00004546742,0.9618492,0.000002634939,0.0002536949,0.00003255894,0.00002691499,0.03488294,0.001250647,0.001313342,0.00008730404,0.0001296425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979917,0.00005303236,0.0003046383,0.00003596656,0.00002657292,0.00004115163,0.00001432659,0.00001390842,0.001518687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985387,0.000005018297,0.001010037,0.00001784284,0.00001887444,0.000003968535,0.00009007677,0.000002770079,0.00031268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08847584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961687,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005134173417358941,"score_gpt":0.1787642347441013,"score_spread":0.1736300613267424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}