{"id":"W2012942321","doi":"10.1163/157006811x567733","title":"Sikhism, Traumatic Repetition, and the Question of Aesthetic Sovereignty","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"South Asian Studies and Diaspora","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Sikhism; Argument (complex analysis); Identity (music); Subject (documents); Sociology; Epistemology; Repetition (rhetorical device); Work (physics); Aesthetics; Philosophy; Politics; Law; Political science; Religious studies; Linguistics; Computer science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005182347,0.0002074807,0.0003552806,0.0006742043,0.00543894,0.004843472,0.0009412146,0.001433622,0.003291584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006730955,0.0001964537,0.0002082811,0.0006503006,0.06524851,0.005460696,0.00723324,0.003000247,0.0001781094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002427777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001547179,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001313398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001781185,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963316,0.002579598,0.0001011043,0.0002481535,0.0004292111,0.0003102807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952033,0.002786725,0.0005397968,0.001023538,0.000220755,0.0002258763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003086557,0.00001943358,0.0007823451,0.00004680414,0.000003486313,0.0002148658,0.1918431,0.00007675034,0.0003585449,0.8000617,0.0005682299,0.00599377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002792414,0.0001226817,0.003753685,0.0003222432,0.00001103146,0.001175889,0.3045378,0.0006614237,0.001620494,0.6105345,0.07719402,0.00003832498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.700204,0.002453027,0.01022365,0.01862387,0.0003266008,0.00003646647,0.00002670158,0.00004873241,0.2680568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981893,0.00008081986,0.0002170089,0.000103795,0.0000215776,0.000006106555,0.000001833866,0.000004692271,0.001374923],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00543894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02740717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04040485174126623,"score_gpt":0.2846243276139518,"score_spread":0.2442194758726856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}