{"id":"W2012976135","doi":"10.1002/eet.309","title":"Environmental NGOs and the Biosafety Protocol: a case study on political influence","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Environment","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Biosafety; Convention on Biological Diversity; Government (linguistics); Convention; Protocol (science); Politics; Public administration; Diversity (politics); Political science; Conference of the parties; Precautionary principle; Montreal Protocol; Business; Public relations; Law; Biodiversity; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007289306,0.0001615341,0.0001104956,0.000006494189,0.0002974567,0.00005397901,0.0001896896,0.0000233718,0.0003961131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003766838,0.00005218009,0.00003841363,0.00004348608,0.0004439032,0.00002747952,0.0001683865,0.0001908998,0.0004949064],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004028341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001910095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003946545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005109839,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997518,0.001164247,0.0002014793,0.0003913775,0.0003547837,0.0003701095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994255,0.0001784035,0.00003265167,0.0001560226,0.000001931464,0.0002054912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001488046,0.01522924,0.1377974,0.00002690662,0.0002957465,0.01638326,0.007127238,0.0003397853,0.6152307,0.05696118,0.0003601309,0.1487603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002049747,0.001663278,0.9605483,0.000003477531,0.00001560612,0.0006477142,0.004185479,0.00001022294,0.002527997,0.0001792344,0.02789718,0.0002718098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.980727,0.000007030805,0.00000288477,0.0007660026,0.000006693044,0.01550636,0.000007961144,0.00001723361,0.002958822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972998,0.000004309585,0.00002964659,0.0003469741,0.00003596936,0.002155982,9.308417e-7,0.000003062311,0.0001232774],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8227509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6361186,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02160223987620201,"score_gpt":0.2332747397665046,"score_spread":0.2116724998903025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}