{"id":"W2012977568","doi":"10.1007/s10699-014-9373-z","title":"Scientific Consensus and Expert Testimony in Courts: Lessons from the Bendectin Litigation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Foundations of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University; Azrieli Foundation","keywords":"Deference; Skepticism; Scientific consensus; Philosophy of science; Epistemic community; Epistemology; Scientific evidence; Value (mathematics); Philosophy of language; Sociology; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Metaphysics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08042942,0.0005516846,0.001686507,0.00363004,0.01660574,0.02440743,0.004596245,0.03833099,0.009983688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2051951,0.000783901,0.001114575,0.00362767,0.0558612,0.02372978,0.01418507,0.02444295,0.0009772084],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01572668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0280427,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02013035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02345681,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9426755,0.03698184,0.002328577,0.003597419,0.009316334,0.005100443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7102332,0.2593497,0.006802802,0.007011343,0.01310878,0.003494172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000224473,0.00002592704,0.0004161931,0.00004697016,0.00001647442,0.0002276825,0.003422464,0.0005492863,0.0000352514,0.9832125,0.004774907,0.007249913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003600971,0.000009334051,0.000335801,0.0001870417,0.00001153368,0.00006561325,0.002032793,0.0007388879,0.00008641791,0.9871553,0.009315861,0.00002535512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05177841,0.009835469,0.02428287,0.6503159,0.0008657994,0.00007184534,0.0001211676,0.00005176735,0.2626768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9487056,0.003389589,0.006591516,0.03101921,0.001122777,0.0001090725,0.00004577776,0.00004917981,0.008967258],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9833943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4253565,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1058819634259524,"score_gpt":0.3314058282883268,"score_spread":0.2255238648623745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}