{"id":"W2013166524","doi":"10.1108/17538250810903774","title":"The human development index as a criterion for optimal planning","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indian Growth and Development Review","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Human Development Index; Economics; Human development (humanity); Index (typography); Capability approach; Welfare; Ranking (information retrieval); Public economics; Human Development Report; Inequality; Value (mathematics); Econometrics; Economic growth; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006100057,0.0009492017,0.0008529843,0.003437209,0.000611257,0.002937959,0.0007697843,0.0007984031,0.004936215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01315134,0.0002853081,0.0007479506,0.003747037,0.002263903,0.001165852,0.001227875,0.001491696,0.0004003318],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004213981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004804068,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007047209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005006342,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99591,0.002265349,0.0002024407,0.0003196707,0.001111628,0.0001908801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947581,0.003371367,0.000614518,0.0002514659,0.000874522,0.0001299613],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000126813,0.0001204727,0.01739916,0.0008913237,0.0002102116,0.0001659443,0.0003985745,0.4634063,0.000820335,0.328045,0.01494869,0.1734672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004389446,0.0003400418,0.01885488,0.001084514,0.0001419989,0.0002845054,0.001542899,0.591033,0.002451316,0.3381958,0.0459149,0.0001122089],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1139007,0.01057849,0.6839085,0.005467057,0.0004848376,0.00118519,0.003055292,0.0004922661,0.1809277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7535933,0.001925987,0.2386756,0.000207364,0.00009453384,0.0007192849,0.0007652128,0.0001081313,0.003910582],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007047209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0322606,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06300983218327812,"score_gpt":0.2686675450186691,"score_spread":0.205657712835391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}