{"id":"W2013166524","doi":"10.1108/17538250810903774","title":"The human development index as a criterion for optimal planning","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indian Growth and Development Review","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Human Development Index; Economics; Human development (humanity); Index (typography); Capability approach; Welfare; Ranking (information retrieval); Public economics; Human Development Report; Inequality; Value (mathematics); Econometrics; Economic growth; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005909553,0.0002186248,0.0004386852,0.0001187916,0.0011474,0.00007454401,0.000237227,0.00008326928,0.00003368797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001164362,0.000192127,0.00006967755,0.0001050647,0.00009019895,0.0001735371,0.00008310613,0.0001280114,0.0002122918],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007543941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001184573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001812534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003883754,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982288,0.00001161089,0.0008878568,0.0003795361,0.00003941037,0.0004527596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992988,0.00007008976,0.0002797231,0.0001604062,0.000020481,0.0001704856],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001123432,0.0002479548,0.6682986,0.008615962,0.0006165658,0.00009881653,0.02130556,0.000003245886,0.000008196474,0.1836758,0.04487007,0.07214692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008847667,0.00007022297,0.1334309,0.0007041761,0.000004796411,0.00009406695,0.00005488605,0.00001085941,0.000149672,0.007103207,0.8569003,0.0005921585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8246125,0.1322917,0.0016116,0.002644128,0.0003919509,0.001988121,0.0000253183,0.0001093089,0.0363254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848883,0.007178788,0.002773907,0.003765361,0.0001511908,0.0004377787,0.00005926788,0.00003807232,0.0007073021],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8120303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8824988,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06300983218327812,"score_gpt":0.2686675450186691,"score_spread":0.205657712835391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}