{"id":"W2013212937","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.023","title":"Simulated wetland conservation-restoration effects on water quantity and quality at watershed scale","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Resources Conservation Service; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Watershed; Wetland; Environmental science; Hydrology (agriculture); Soil and Water Assessment Tool; Water quality; SWAT model; Sediment; Streamflow; Ecology; Geography; Geology; Drainage basin","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006176767,0.0001781746,0.000215882,0.00006914819,0.000264479,0.00002634452,0.0001500669,0.00006803698,0.0007228114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000886874,0.0001219402,0.00006305646,0.00003686365,0.0002400208,0.0002662266,0.0004015102,0.0001923733,0.0003258721],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001273971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":4.959916e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003788561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001295849,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986976,0.00008690991,0.0003741638,0.0002398589,0.0003643379,0.0002371284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994882,0.00004702577,0.0001731873,0.0001963273,0.00000274061,0.00009253541],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000345431,0.0002686054,0.8014482,0.00004602117,0.0001454112,0.0000497957,0.0004706087,0.0009469497,0.1929548,0.00006771424,0.002015744,0.001240743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001526972,0.0003021834,0.9433292,0.00001155613,0.0000971713,0.000006216576,0.00007288025,0.0001083369,0.04100504,0.0003286785,0.01301369,0.0001981424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969408,0.00001020668,0.00005077871,0.001147979,0.0003721835,0.0002820453,0.000002047572,0.00001165633,0.001182306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974633,0.00007358307,0.0003296956,0.0008874463,0.00005258991,0.000004235439,0.000009723932,0.00001103698,0.001168373],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1519498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7914279,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008818262569059236,"score_gpt":0.2258194602588236,"score_spread":0.2170011976897644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}