{"id":"W2013370140","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00658.x","title":"Postfire response of North American boreal forest net primary productivity analyzed with satellite observations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Change Biology","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":190,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service","funders":"National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Primary production; Environmental science; Boreal; Taiga; Boreal ecosystem; Disturbance (geology); Carbon cycle; Ecosystem; Atmospheric sciences; Sink (geography); Carbon sink; Productivity; Physical geography; Forestry; Ecology; Geography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004735509,0.000292884,0.0002493609,0.0004104579,0.0002192701,0.0003671498,0.0003025047,0.0003194225,0.0005007271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001088806,0.0001811177,0.0003244547,0.0003563134,0.0001342906,0.0002616896,0.000171598,0.0002258921,0.00009684915],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004360942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001967585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02179935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03971804,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999805,0.00003268187,0.00001337713,0.00005872092,0.00006027982,0.00002997256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992938,0.0001869841,0.000200821,0.00008068844,0.0001533613,0.00008438498],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000181521,0.0001067804,0.9792935,0.00001439631,0.00009132327,0.00007936945,0.00006404802,0.009552388,0.005746393,0.00002489055,0.0001980808,0.004647198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005498925,0.00005326502,0.9834748,0.000001892146,0.00001328353,0.00003211895,0.00003243563,0.01569225,0.0005739615,0.00001752066,0.0000984319,0.000004521882],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.999501,0.00001551163,0.0001443059,0.000005461433,0.000002027243,0.000002649933,0.0001825165,0.00001395861,0.0001326402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993131,0.00001163238,0.0002291008,0.00000437233,0.00000254136,0.000005587839,0.0003694633,0.000002498355,0.00006171767],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9782007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04334491,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01997700833999072,"score_gpt":0.2331149762540424,"score_spread":0.2131379679140517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}