{"id":"W2013370140","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00658.x","title":"Postfire response of North American boreal forest net primary productivity analyzed with satellite observations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Change Biology","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":190,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service","funders":"National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Primary production; Environmental science; Boreal; Taiga; Boreal ecosystem; Disturbance (geology); Carbon cycle; Ecosystem; Atmospheric sciences; Sink (geography); Carbon sink; Productivity; Physical geography; Forestry; Ecology; Geography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004029772,0.000171934,0.0003069241,0.00002769709,0.00006018327,0.000005846381,0.000187625,0.00004729205,0.00001358612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000143746,0.0001353711,0.00004119192,0.000913101,0.000482241,0.0001271722,0.00007253301,0.00006746544,0.00003505155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002804499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002746732,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009357805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02658989,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983467,0.0005526411,0.0001935277,0.0004140806,0.0001384798,0.0003546019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992431,0.00008707723,0.0002099341,0.0003415273,0.00002094628,0.00009745682],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004721824,0.00008980019,0.9891734,0.00001044233,0.00001996713,0.000008146339,0.00007331311,0.000002862075,0.0005829343,0.00006472377,0.00007047503,0.009431725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002336949,0.0007870062,0.9946637,0.000005464809,0.00001581093,0.00003214812,0.00001109421,0.00003185901,0.0000557631,0.00002202697,0.003990659,0.0001507903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977589,0.0001129714,0.00003146763,0.0002498271,0.00008457892,0.0005421249,0.0001765171,0.0000410534,0.001002598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986004,0.00002295451,0.000945619,0.0002042541,0.00003937109,0.00006173164,0.00009387688,0.000009611465,0.00002222354],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01723208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997239,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01997700833999072,"score_gpt":0.2331149762540424,"score_spread":0.2131379679140517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}