{"id":"W2013438082","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-246x.2006.03231.x","title":"Wavelet analysis of the coherence between Bouguer gravity and topography: application to the elastic thickness anisotropy in the Canadian Shield","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geophysical Journal International","topic":"Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Multitaper; Bouguer anomaly; Wavelet; Geology; Anisotropy; Lithosphere; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Isotropy; Azimuth; Geodesy; Geometry; Optics; Physics; Gravity anomaly; Seismology; Mathematics; Amplitude; Tectonics; Algorithm; Statistics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000365074,0.00006315389,0.00009492284,0.0001502635,0.0002259109,0.0001030234,0.0005082939,0.00002866812,0.00005353012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002769551,0.00003085838,0.00008161415,0.0005656478,0.0001110195,0.00007769229,0.00001399658,0.0002578532,0.000005044956],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001159606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004521481,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3138736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1235438,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991647,0.00009818575,0.000164747,0.0001032845,0.00034207,0.0001270317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995092,0.0001786283,0.00008342769,0.0001174881,0.00006473315,0.00004655851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009604517,0.00001603609,0.9743323,0.00000124708,0.00007558368,0.00000206119,0.0002730235,0.001288382,0.00003747316,0.002176842,0.003099495,0.01868795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004262533,0.00001754501,0.9751107,0.000006712614,0.00005252937,0.000006427819,0.00006520021,0.009668693,0.00004740417,0.009991916,0.00494725,0.00004297018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9797032,0.00002185723,0.002587212,0.01624425,0.0001313447,0.0001171916,0.000122182,0.000005168513,0.001067596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979015,0.000003666388,0.0001716253,0.001683278,0.000175817,0.000001520966,0.00003364648,9.864444e-7,0.00002798514],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1903299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8924493,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007731724034744112,"score_gpt":0.2238547375594135,"score_spread":0.2161230135246694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}