{"id":"W2013536940","doi":"10.1017/s0266462309090436","title":"The history of health technology assessment in Australia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Economics","funders":"","keywords":"Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme; Scope (computer science); Health technology; Subsidy; Government (linguistics); Advisory committee; Technology assessment; Business; Environmental planning; Political science; Medicine; Public administration; Economic growth; Health care; Economics; Geography; Computer science; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01295713,0.0007471449,0.001591595,0.006336717,0.0009825497,0.003817157,0.001241117,0.004085231,0.004010065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03383092,0.0007392235,0.001009364,0.01123032,0.004107276,0.004782318,0.00300381,0.0053333,0.001359167],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009387707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0160449,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01756193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009481291,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9891598,0.004614317,0.001421246,0.0008116729,0.003723353,0.000269649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9658501,0.02158669,0.003104375,0.001021913,0.007633612,0.0008033179],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007276845,0.00009757295,0.001090382,0.02238314,0.0001145021,0.0003325618,0.001110914,0.001429994,0.0004575767,0.05637396,0.03092301,0.8856137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002202737,0.0001863601,0.006821614,0.02432305,0.00009384224,0.001050562,0.0003681466,0.0005453732,0.0003501153,0.02047107,0.9457124,0.00005538007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002850784,0.9867432,0.001053827,0.005854452,0.0005176883,0.00003007611,0.00001887972,0.00001083091,0.005485902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007408744,0.9855005,0.001696003,0.002740565,0.000887059,0.0000693433,0.00002847011,0.000009100113,0.001660239],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06852472,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3860542894505743,"score_gpt":0.5622989178234776,"score_spread":0.1762446283729033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}