{"id":"W2013557783","doi":"10.1007/s00220-008-0438-0","title":"On the Exact Evaluation of Certain Instances of the Potts Partition Function by Quantum Computers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Mathematical Physics","topic":"Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Potts model; Partition function (quantum field theory); Exponential function; Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Partition (number theory); Quantum; Polynomial; Frequency partition of a graph; Graph; Ising model; Line graph; Quantum mechanics; Graph power","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008696684,0.00009408531,0.0001546474,0.00003029423,0.0002340896,0.00001541731,0.001490581,0.00003240442,0.000003874145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002059774,0.00005673575,0.0000764955,0.0005611237,0.0003285774,0.00009680388,0.0003119163,0.0002287324,0.00000415037],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003590128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000625117,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007030318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002422599,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998347,0.0005788134,0.0003417563,0.0001323173,0.0004905155,0.0001095959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966753,0.001251063,0.0002430453,0.001669232,0.0001445116,0.00001684637],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003171134,0.0004927223,0.00007707442,0.00002162905,0.00001472123,4.33377e-8,0.001765042,0.01559786,0.0003050812,0.9649183,0.0005587578,0.01624562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001029918,0.00002855929,0.000880571,0.00008898833,0.000006474605,8.757456e-7,0.00003017135,0.6000766,0.0004018189,0.3983167,0.00002685283,0.00003938046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4726669,0.0001660094,0.5221874,0.002950853,0.000117524,0.0004538842,0.000005187145,0.00003468565,0.001417529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993856,0.00001920193,0.005970634,0.0001054218,0.00001045166,0.00002539114,0.000003434597,0.000005219263,0.000004274242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5844787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2769895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06980303628868849,"score_gpt":0.2985053218965596,"score_spread":0.2287022856078711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}