{"id":"W2013561562","doi":"10.1109/aps.2013.6711110","title":"A surface impedance boundary condition approach to the FDTD modeling of graphene","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Finite-difference time-domain method; Graphene; Boundary value problem; Electrical impedance; Materials science; Range (aeronautics); Surface (topology); Boundary (topology); Graphene nanoribbons; Computer science; Electronic engineering; Optics; Nanotechnology; Physics; Mathematics; Electrical engineering; Mathematical analysis; Engineering; Composite material; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000166263,0.0003648836,0.0003141293,0.0004726863,0.0004155445,0.0004863233,0.0006808554,0.001024812,0.002162265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006886914,0.0001807695,0.0004118493,0.000514239,0.0003821946,0.0006056671,0.0004086056,0.0007887456,0.0006963726],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004372769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004784975,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001914153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00132468,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998599,0.00002706895,0.000006857444,0.00001443131,0.00008086947,0.00001088068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998689,0.00005633049,0.00001173056,0.00001813458,0.00003865366,0.000006354633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004739796,0.00006235646,0.0004907921,0.0001708139,0.00001638436,0.0003621729,0.000272485,0.6377777,0.1406549,0.1580704,0.003136424,0.05893809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004540398,0.00001120143,0.00005602743,0.000009793641,0.000002402206,0.00006460968,0.00001300509,0.978883,0.007595361,0.006036822,0.007315144,0.000008021898],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00658034,0.0001334271,0.9856415,0.0001661257,0.00007141259,0.00003365802,0.0001008292,0.0002834371,0.006989291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2633467,0.0007429494,0.7245818,0.0001582815,0.00006918993,0.0002852357,0.0003434494,0.0002019248,0.01027043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002162265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00723356,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01762566948533451,"score_gpt":0.2582310935171527,"score_spread":0.2406054240318182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}