{"id":"W2013669236","doi":"10.1063/1.1463216","title":"Local existence proofs for the boundary value problem for static spherically symmetric Einstein–Yang–Mills fields with compact gauge groups","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Physics","topic":"Black Holes and Theoretical Physics","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Gauge group; Uniqueness; Mathematics; Group (periodic table); Lie group; Boundary value problem; Einstein; Einstein field equations; Gauge theory; Symmetry group; Mathematical analysis; Mathematical physics; Physics; Pure mathematics; Quantum mechanics; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002297714,0.001291343,0.00101109,0.001834128,0.001876232,0.001651528,0.001136292,0.001589198,0.003849555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008964833,0.0006071685,0.001371694,0.0005550436,0.003916823,0.003906447,0.005724971,0.003191098,0.0006083678],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009005702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006349237,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003031525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002579806,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995322,0.0001638649,0.0000353927,0.00008473991,0.000117631,0.00006617084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967043,0.001356581,0.0007054556,0.0001879951,0.0005677086,0.0004780307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007487982,0.00007369333,0.001419092,0.0002461752,0.00005535802,0.0009842495,0.001025294,0.007209942,0.01024943,0.9696919,0.001384779,0.007585037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000882626,0.0001639563,0.0008557847,0.00007332539,0.00005265046,0.0008017743,0.0006512612,0.07487156,0.007276244,0.9124711,0.002638568,0.00005544744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4691906,0.001743372,0.4957264,0.002904662,0.0002330374,0.0001283028,0.0001297176,0.0003073532,0.02963651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9196234,0.001058133,0.06532593,0.0002941069,0.0003201723,0.0002358719,0.000213721,0.0001590003,0.01276955],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003849555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01287806,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01832172741336873,"score_gpt":0.2454310255682843,"score_spread":0.2271092981549156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}