{"id":"W2013674341","doi":"10.1142/s0217595912400064","title":"OPTIMAL PROCUREMENT STRATEGY UNDER SUPPLY RISK","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asia Pacific Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Supply Chain and Inventory Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pooling; Procurement; Nash equilibrium; Competitor analysis; Information asymmetry; Order (exchange); Microeconomics; Business; Competition (biology); Industrial organization; Supplier relationship management; Supply chain; Outcome (game theory); Game theory; Economics; Supply chain management; Computer science; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002234381,0.0008448287,0.001478959,0.000741953,0.000527834,0.002602766,0.001120267,0.001925005,0.007029577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00615422,0.0009329399,0.0006837776,0.0008792246,0.001183373,0.002382313,0.001476963,0.00104488,0.001161999],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002371192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003003309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001888614,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998392,0.0007838859,0.00009146219,0.0002354423,0.0002266636,0.000270571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973375,0.001560513,0.0003620934,0.0001628069,0.0003287306,0.0002482255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004692671,0.0001180481,0.001433861,0.0002670366,0.0001147562,0.0005309077,0.0002870419,0.8138598,0.002962789,0.1513758,0.002147494,0.02643302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008468846,0.0001811491,0.0006693939,0.00004884421,0.00003810149,0.0001490727,0.0002197639,0.8674321,0.0006203926,0.1288158,0.001693507,0.00004717738],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3581668,0.001410244,0.5769939,0.002512576,0.0001045479,0.0003977686,0.0006226525,0.0003553415,0.05943613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665927,0.0005455936,0.02128341,0.0001131224,0.00002846868,0.0001409147,0.0001114083,0.00004546299,0.01113885],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007029577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02351624,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09584052852995457,"score_gpt":0.3404266115999856,"score_spread":0.244586083070031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}