{"id":"W2013674341","doi":"10.1142/s0217595912400064","title":"OPTIMAL PROCUREMENT STRATEGY UNDER SUPPLY RISK","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asia Pacific Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Supply Chain and Inventory Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pooling; Procurement; Nash equilibrium; Competitor analysis; Information asymmetry; Order (exchange); Microeconomics; Business; Competition (biology); Industrial organization; Supplier relationship management; Supply chain; Outcome (game theory); Game theory; Economics; Supply chain management; Computer science; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005458802,0.0001555081,0.0001885058,0.0006306749,0.000434589,0.0005970226,0.0003847707,0.00006107995,0.002891296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002619766,0.0001230714,0.0001148119,0.0005154276,0.0001183981,0.002424579,0.0001527138,0.0005881589,0.0006374558],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001557238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001574377,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005305825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006224616,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996808,0.0001105959,0.00051487,0.0001648901,0.001801529,0.0006001489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982506,0.00009713774,0.0002273685,0.0001839003,0.001169522,0.00007146249],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003652454,0.001303964,0.1203349,0.0001262303,0.000367694,0.00004017052,0.0004112093,0.01086855,0.001328805,0.4584601,0.3993209,0.007072235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001876327,0.0002490527,0.1053628,0.0001095281,0.00008379515,0.00004994811,0.01671979,0.003436353,0.0004350135,0.004592706,0.8666385,0.0004461285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6605839,0.002600565,0.002879405,0.01256874,0.001980737,0.001259128,0.00001228596,0.00004965541,0.3180656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992988,0.00009877731,0.0005210376,0.0001956866,0.003580917,0.00001929796,0.00001932387,0.00002405158,0.002552861],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4673176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980202,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09584052852995457,"score_gpt":0.3404266115999856,"score_spread":0.244586083070031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}