{"id":"W2013824478","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0122481","title":"Delineating Species with DNA Barcodes: A Case of Taxon Dependent Method Performance in Moths","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Helsingin Yliopiston Tiedesäätiö; Genome Canada; Ontario Genomics; Ontario Genomics Institute; Government of Canada; Ella ja Georg Ehrnroothin Säätiö; Helsingin Yliopisto","keywords":"Taxon; Biology; DNA barcoding; Monophyly; Evolutionary biology; Barcode; Taxonomic rank; Biodiversity; Range (aeronautics); Species complex; Zoology; Phylogenetics; Ecology; Phylogenetic tree; Clade; Genetics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07587386,0.001536199,0.001216787,0.002604106,0.002091518,0.003228083,0.002343806,0.004016995,0.0007794771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2246877,0.0009618886,0.001305405,0.002269629,0.004217005,0.004153937,0.002761904,0.002892836,0.001098141],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00117164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009220923,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003212748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002173792,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9136823,0.04834941,0.006303106,0.01202053,0.01824517,0.001399428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6979208,0.2336898,0.02081593,0.02610972,0.01985939,0.001604372],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002126947,0.0004676993,0.3618364,0.001989579,0.00200992,0.001591264,0.02456454,0.03800447,0.1103952,0.01180907,0.003482993,0.441722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001414152,0.004753662,0.339459,0.001450142,0.0009791323,0.00892834,0.006137681,0.314201,0.2516886,0.04204029,0.02938413,0.0008365902],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6737313,0.005548313,0.3094122,0.002866242,0.0002688325,0.0004478355,0.0004512056,0.00119738,0.006076693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7842829,0.0006361333,0.2113722,0.001219685,0.00009609141,0.0002101808,0.0003734533,0.0005175561,0.001291738],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07587386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4012641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05410358902405629,"score_gpt":0.2541499110081089,"score_spread":0.2000463219840526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}