{"id":"W2013857353","doi":"10.1080/13504500009470056","title":"Comparative aspects of mountain land resources management and sustainability: Case studies from India and Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology","topic":"Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Indigenous; Resource management (computing); Livelihood; Context (archaeology); Natural resource; Environmental resource management; Sustainable development; Work (physics); Natural resource management; Environmental planning; Land use; Geography; Business; Political science; Economics; Ecology; Agriculture; Archaeology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001366659,0.0004160475,0.0005186724,0.002249331,0.01660443,0.003790568,0.002094879,0.001580241,0.002771785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003688811,0.0003330666,0.0004272264,0.009429807,0.004304028,0.001052164,0.003554,0.001574347,0.0001415841],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04597412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02974918,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9683532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9884476,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968956,0.001046587,0.00008208265,0.0001242771,0.0005202012,0.001331263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973989,0.001280374,0.0002024151,0.00009321476,0.0005286473,0.0004965443],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003934842,0.0009289726,0.1239355,0.001042758,0.0001442596,0.04566617,0.6979945,0.005758968,0.002213626,0.0486052,0.008260436,0.06505608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000276568,0.000107891,0.06637766,0.0002770693,0.00006559455,0.001896209,0.8874182,0.001313453,0.0005558328,0.0007211827,0.0411648,0.00007438502],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9722337,0.0006529826,0.0001730637,0.0008080383,0.000008042543,0.00007514902,0.0001195279,0.000007289262,0.02592221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994635,0.001186244,0.000466399,0.0001524028,0.000003529647,0.00004389398,0.00008136628,0.000009248422,0.003421891],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04597412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3335671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006054638286913663,"score_gpt":0.2320031129466947,"score_spread":0.225948474659781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}