{"id":"W2014064369","doi":"10.1016/j.nimb.2004.04.041","title":"The potential for AMS analysis of 10Be using BeF−","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Health Canada; Center for African Studies","keywords":"Ion; Isobar; Accelerator mass spectrometry; Metastability; Excited state; Mass spectrometry; Atomic physics; Chemistry; Interference (communication); Physics; Analytical Chemistry (journal)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006747722,0.002519676,0.001390822,0.002368838,0.001836347,0.002938382,0.002314615,0.003603891,0.01028746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008518006,0.001057953,0.001685175,0.001415753,0.001432914,0.002270549,0.001757801,0.002201195,0.00537105],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008563604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001275992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002288518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006363984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972447,0.0009233411,0.00007392059,0.0006788361,0.0007911467,0.0002880654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943632,0.002271743,0.0004959152,0.0009958857,0.001556944,0.0003162738],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004076176,0.0002245042,0.02906049,0.00104991,0.0008092892,0.0006554905,0.0004462873,0.002297656,0.8792878,0.008430603,0.005136502,0.06852515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002015972,0.0009278366,0.01471018,0.0001883727,0.0004889407,0.002577269,0.000438663,0.01700231,0.834766,0.01722049,0.1112906,0.0001877145],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2357098,0.0125187,0.6909036,0.006056594,0.003724098,0.0004892229,0.003461502,0.006996742,0.04013963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5429417,0.004306153,0.4112668,0.004633976,0.001543089,0.0006229729,0.002602757,0.001855416,0.03022722],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01028746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03568578,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03934811091843488,"score_gpt":0.4069669430014795,"score_spread":0.3676188320830446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}