{"id":"W2014089987","doi":"10.1002/j.2334-5837.2007.tb02909.x","title":"4.6.3 A Self‐assessment Scheme and an Evaluation of its Reliability based on ISO 9004:2000","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INCOSE International Symposium","topic":"Reliability and Agreement in Measurement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Audit; Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Self-assessment; Process (computing); Scheme (mathematics); Quality audit; Reliability engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Process management; Business; Accounting; Mathematics; Engineering; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03849853,0.0003683149,0.0004495757,0.003949972,0.0007554149,0.001776756,0.0007181023,0.0005819544,0.002653721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07056085,0.000255472,0.001106267,0.00211494,0.0009350263,0.001269328,0.001269086,0.0005729139,0.000812338],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001156336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00144887,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001323754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009875322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9558446,0.02033785,0.005605108,0.001194545,0.01636636,0.0006515558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8847031,0.04235464,0.007775784,0.008435303,0.05540046,0.001330681],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001797375,0.001352656,0.5664302,0.001097303,0.0004112667,0.0001913695,0.01309391,0.006649464,0.0260599,0.007007504,0.004663888,0.3712452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022594,0.006097696,0.8235381,0.0006649921,0.0004610692,0.0006937481,0.01545723,0.06756592,0.05232719,0.004556122,0.02808394,0.0003281029],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9135041,0.0002004654,0.05936473,0.0003206237,0.0001756787,0.00187167,0.0004714247,0.000606709,0.02348464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9347226,0.00009705663,0.06095643,0.00003637077,0.00002657427,0.0008093994,0.0004332424,0.00004310494,0.002875328],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9615015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2036021,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09485833129002842,"score_gpt":0.4272861330272782,"score_spread":0.3324278017372498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}