{"id":"W2014102115","doi":"10.1115/ipc2004-0320","title":"Fracture Toughness Testing of Pipeline Girth Welds","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2004 International Pipeline Conference, Volumes 1, 2, and 3","topic":"Fatigue and fracture mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Girth (graph theory); Welding; Materials science; Shielded metal arc welding; Fracture toughness; Crack tip opening displacement; Toughness; Structural engineering; Pipeline (software); Metallurgy; Composite material; Fracture mechanics; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Arc welding; Mathematics; Gas tungsten arc welding; Crack closure","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000109607,0.000229167,0.0002621492,0.0001432832,0.00004735647,0.00005236172,0.0002515101,0.0001559158,0.000257851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001386501,0.0002141466,0.00006117697,0.0001602168,0.00005478686,0.0002007356,0.00004347206,0.0002814584,0.00002319205],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000418757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006969288,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001386472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001027175,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998876,0.000009532247,0.0004059006,0.0002213728,0.0002699023,0.0002172574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999253,0.00004748943,0.00009136917,0.0001733465,0.0003440111,0.00009079652],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002316331,0.0008362959,0.0167434,0.001082411,0.000631613,0.0001599638,0.00388228,0.4029288,0.02187249,0.04774541,0.05220829,0.4516774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004171031,0.0002122966,0.00689692,0.0008412387,0.0001206044,0.0001071433,0.0005357442,0.7838073,0.02640729,0.02911879,0.1465013,0.001280429],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2065202,0.002273711,0.7560334,0.001710383,0.002487949,0.0003340898,0.0001935936,0.0004331566,0.03001362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940475,0.00020675,0.00398971,0.0002358009,0.0004771191,0.000007167562,0.00009575485,0.00002908344,0.0009110625],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7875274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8732644,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01516949972582375,"score_gpt":0.2268067715634359,"score_spread":0.2116372718376121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}