{"id":"W2014274658","doi":"10.2980/17-2-3304","title":"Joint effects of inverse density-dependence and extreme environmental variation on the viability of a social bird species","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecoscience","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Population viability analysis; Allee effect; Density dependence; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Threatened species; Population; Vital rates; Population size; Ecology; Small population size; Population density; Population model; Biology; Population growth; Demography; Habitat; Endangered species","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001311767,0.0002977094,0.0003633676,0.0005849545,0.000266096,0.0007801336,0.0003110203,0.0002798348,0.0008516581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004688382,0.000207234,0.0005289985,0.0003680798,0.000824426,0.0005323724,0.0007175342,0.0004396212,0.0000686636],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003261309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002191261,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003176335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00813828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992597,0.0003597173,0.00004636833,0.0001946064,0.0000807686,0.00005892961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957284,0.002514404,0.0009720089,0.0004066825,0.0002065788,0.0001719016],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001011013,0.00004696248,0.9616596,0.0000353687,0.0004045457,0.000425385,0.0001626862,0.0203532,0.004521815,0.001132393,0.000108139,0.01104891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002768324,0.00006526709,0.9523724,0.000006141988,0.00007860777,0.0002272802,0.0001193585,0.04529718,0.0004771999,0.001151647,0.0001834904,0.00001867105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960607,0.00008603102,0.003237274,0.00003362161,0.000002283524,0.000004310803,0.00008677138,0.00001216343,0.0004769832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995314,0.00002566068,0.0003128966,0.000004843963,0.000001996175,0.000002346517,0.00006843945,0.000002106956,0.00005042656],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003176335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006937325,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01649671188538667,"score_gpt":0.2013787185283012,"score_spread":0.1848820066429145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}