{"id":"W2014356848","doi":"10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.16171.x","title":"Functional rarefaction: estimating functional diversity from field data","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oikos","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rarefaction (ecology); Species richness; Diversity index; Sampling (signal processing); Biology; Species diversity; Statistics; Gamma diversity; Mathematics; Ecology; Alpha diversity; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002219302,0.00006097633,0.00005633293,0.00001545604,0.0006161147,0.00000789037,0.0001314958,0.00005236437,0.01033112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008838558,0.00006017794,0.0000181509,0.00007206036,0.00006293604,0.0002515873,0.0007946289,0.0001083573,0.001008792],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006058835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004145899,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007298925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002537962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993699,0.00001183404,0.0000973502,0.000228569,0.0001720325,0.0001203419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994605,0.0002647082,0.0000449593,0.0001852669,0.000007161124,0.00003742511],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004550543,0.00004703062,0.9355449,0.000001533465,0.00003572502,0.000007286817,0.0001393503,0.002457723,0.0001585462,0.00016138,0.05150167,0.009899321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001900449,0.00001597303,0.9830738,0.000002008325,0.00001524893,0.000003058835,0.00009326709,0.01077927,0.00005289432,0.001266106,0.004428528,0.00007984838],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5589342,0.00003850868,0.3902624,0.001308551,0.002123464,0.00009644102,0.0000446116,0.00008942386,0.04710237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884383,0.000003973313,0.008766413,0.0008189202,0.0002071793,0.000001653453,0.0001647624,0.000003211829,0.001595568],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4295041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999769,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04015355566760553,"score_gpt":0.2506670797653926,"score_spread":0.2105135240977871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}