{"id":"W2014411687","doi":"10.1186/1471-2288-8-32","title":"The ratio of means method as an alternative to mean differences for analyzing continuous outcome variables in meta-analysis: A simulation study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":339,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Hospital for Sick Children; Health Sciences Centre; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre; SickKids Foundation; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Statistics; Confidence interval; Meta-analysis; Strictly standardized mean difference; Publication bias; Pooling; Standard deviation; Study heterogeneity; Sample size determination; Pooled variance; Weighting; Mean difference; Type I and type II errors; Statistical power; Mathematics; Medicine; Econometrics; Computer science; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7407974,0.0003678635,0.01007288,0.0023993,0.0005326459,0.0002879225,0.004450638,0.0002134198,0.004008436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7792231,0.0001485715,0.003414688,0.006552769,0.0004418008,0.0002014353,0.0004719245,0.0005920812,0.000062124],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006288167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006275284,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00180581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02008636,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4277253,0.5310211,0.01695005,0.002695406,0.02043251,0.001175643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2144418,0.7687662,0.004065583,0.005133848,0.006678965,0.0009135803],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00127766,0.00204495,0.6253496,0.0001463233,0.1253039,0.00009242287,0.04958177,0.09963482,0.0001837025,0.06144586,0.0008180459,0.03412099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001167362,0.001667888,0.04606834,0.00001114977,0.02792487,0.000009995226,0.02609448,0.8183098,0.00008501181,0.07712758,0.001168631,0.0003648342],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1427725,0.0004867298,0.8529857,0.000812789,0.00009912213,0.002614624,0.00001383048,0.000004531119,0.0002101812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7705151,0.00001970036,0.2267715,0.0001194116,0.00007673687,0.0006556588,0.000004118641,0.00001263335,0.001825175],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.718675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.974214244217264,"score_gpt":0.7376015835997741,"score_spread":0.2366126606174899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}