{"id":"W2014578157","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.2-160.v1","title":"Systematic assessment of benefits and risks: study protocol for a multi-criteria decision analysis using the Analytic Hierarchy Process for comparative effectiveness research","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Hamilton Health Sciences Foundation; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Pairwise comparison; Protocol (science); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Risk analysis (engineering); Decision analysis; Process (computing); Hierarchy; Management science; Operations research; Medicine; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Engineering; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1282837,0.0004530223,0.004047158,0.002815907,0.0008495612,0.0006170163,0.001239919,0.0003302481,0.00006920945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01033685,0.0003895196,0.0004647644,0.001373053,0.0003532697,0.0003166849,0.00090632,0.0008503537,0.00001672358],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001273709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001008154,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002415608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004356704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9849217,0.005957218,0.005863137,0.001617338,0.0007510484,0.000889536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9693372,0.0230824,0.003119835,0.001576662,0.002624234,0.0002596799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001507886,0.005217108,0.2962069,0.502134,0.01370745,0.000002156414,0.02939899,0.137737,0.00002166793,0.01283396,0.0009761348,0.000256704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003149792,0.0006666053,0.05878594,0.007193398,0.0002496896,9.32244e-7,0.007052489,0.9138619,0.00001171833,0.008639016,0.00002138577,0.0003671515],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","genre_scores_codex":[0.4060594,0.0006240857,0.08538345,0.0002746831,0.0001033833,0.5065244,0.0009878506,0.00002071193,0.00002196838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4568492,0.00001117058,0.008048958,0.00002180139,0.00009694316,0.5348516,0.00003860898,0.00005194858,0.00002972253],"genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7761249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998557,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9021396037671123,"score_gpt":0.7155800561382437,"score_spread":0.1865595476288686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}