{"id":"W2014666525","doi":"10.2134/jeq2005.0253","title":"Utilization of Biosolids during the Phytoremediation of Hydrocarbon‐Contaminated Soil","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Quality","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Biosolids; Phytoremediation; Sewage sludge; Soil water; Chemistry; Loam; Environmental chemistry; Agronomy; Amendment; Soil conditioner; Environmental science; Soil contamination; Sewage; Environmental engineering; Soil science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005665485,0.0001546882,0.0002855051,0.00001418368,0.00007324389,0.000005136053,0.0002552759,0.00008213962,0.0004219097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001952956,0.0001149582,0.0001671968,0.0001370605,0.0005444683,0.000239402,0.0001236268,0.0001474569,0.000007484892],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003455495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006138785,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002624749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002748623,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979025,0.0001502246,0.0009486671,0.0001446392,0.0006785402,0.0001754458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998445,0.00005869264,0.001217859,0.0002220066,0.000003625978,0.00005284218],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009860245,0.0004703641,0.5777709,0.00002220933,0.00002948871,0.000003141142,0.0002683635,0.04032614,0.3787244,0.00003826332,0.00002500461,0.002223111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005944793,0.0001218134,0.9402134,0.00001351058,0.00003900025,0.00001482588,0.0004050077,0.001195532,0.05686509,0.0002746514,0.0001506743,0.0001119652],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976339,0.0001413032,0.001426979,0.00004834634,0.0001016031,0.0001137549,0.00001053239,0.000004237342,0.0005193531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988668,0.0001453255,0.0006940244,0.00002614646,0.00005656619,0.000001467436,0.000005080552,0.00001483836,0.0001897691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3624426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4687859,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008752013248413107,"score_gpt":0.2227699288555585,"score_spread":0.2140179156071454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}