{"id":"W2014691299","doi":"10.1137/090763871","title":"Thin Film Limits for Ginzburg–Landau with Strong Applied Magnetic Fields","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis","topic":"Theoretical and Computational Physics","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Magnetic field; Condensed matter physics; Superconductivity; Vortex; Convergence (economics); Mathematics; Thin film; Field (mathematics); Work (physics); Ginzburg–Landau theory; Position (finance); Physics; Mathematical analysis; Mechanics; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002129595,0.0001957159,0.0003941615,0.0001075096,0.0001930653,0.0001467087,0.0002207014,0.00005043416,0.002828141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000135543,0.0001244004,0.0003669297,0.0003257346,0.00008699571,0.00005754056,0.00001939691,0.0005047241,0.00007868071],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007350081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003835983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001066323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001293543,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988225,0.00002273514,0.0003255893,0.0002055735,0.0003422959,0.0002813753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988742,0.0004545274,0.0001402012,0.0002015915,0.0001180114,0.0002115065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008326875,0.0003037957,0.0001850028,0.00001382831,0.0006281323,0.000001890501,0.00009759024,0.01178491,0.00007913705,0.979013,0.0001783584,0.007631109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006073827,0.00023213,0.0002717325,0.00001692348,0.0008673201,0.000003558206,0.0001276204,0.05998494,0.0003423766,0.9370258,0.000305266,0.0002149887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1409986,0.000004523795,0.8380969,0.001028141,0.00005231797,0.000167368,0.00002550678,0.00002191112,0.01960468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855157,2.70823e-7,0.01320129,0.0001366816,0.0004877132,0.00002598185,0.00002191088,0.00001711911,0.0005933407],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8445171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980834,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006228603289715719,"score_gpt":0.2327337721955657,"score_spread":0.22650516890585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}