{"id":"W2014709725","doi":"10.1007/s10657-012-9354-z","title":"Biodiversity conservation through private initiative: the case of Earth Sanctuaries Ltd","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Law and Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministère des Transports; Agence de l'Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l'Energie","keywords":"Private sector; Transaction cost; Business; Public sector; Biodiversity conservation; Biodiversity; Argument (complex analysis); Commercial law; Environmental resource management; Public finance; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Economics; Finance; Political science; Ecology; Economic growth; Economy; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00725458,0.0003756615,0.0005413956,0.0007421206,0.02136145,0.01569952,0.002285211,0.0207796,0.008359636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01278819,0.0006493549,0.0006394038,0.000995985,0.01100182,0.006117279,0.008698781,0.01163946,0.0004352599],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008465257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01516466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06382366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1391831,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9916002,0.001918436,0.0001781608,0.0007076417,0.001123439,0.004472148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859495,0.007260916,0.0007867168,0.0008788399,0.001074686,0.004049268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002187486,0.000348997,0.01361396,0.00009679917,0.0001107729,0.008589269,0.02002149,0.001801874,0.001000951,0.9161984,0.02156959,0.01642922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005785255,0.0009296288,0.03854934,0.0008869274,0.0004903593,0.007486741,0.1064991,0.01500434,0.004081144,0.3450606,0.4798605,0.0005728881],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4753037,0.001296252,0.002916244,0.05420353,0.0002120518,0.000184321,0.00005926309,0.00005094519,0.4657738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9625394,0.0002345035,0.0004419593,0.006718134,0.0000823521,0.00007720874,0.00001127948,0.00002492743,0.02987022],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06382366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1269044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03389211218306671,"score_gpt":0.1993933649801322,"score_spread":0.1655012527970655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}