{"id":"W2014757500","doi":"10.1167/7.9.923","title":"The impact of action similarity on visual object identification","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vision","topic":"Visual Attention and Saliency Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Object (grammar); Similarity (geometry); Identification (biology); Visual Objects; Action (physics); Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Association (psychology); Cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognition; Psychology; Visual perception; Communication; Cognitive psychology; Pattern recognition (psychology); Perception; Neuroscience; Image (mathematics)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001612547,0.0005119718,0.0005035741,0.0005112652,0.0002955249,0.0009060026,0.0005659155,0.0007798523,0.003596934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02342181,0.0002788733,0.000342931,0.0002027838,0.0007185723,0.001483973,0.001319021,0.0005432172,0.0002886279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003605189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003922459,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007623854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007299682,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997919,0.0006915584,0.0001817322,0.0004036672,0.0006189926,0.0001850408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831738,0.01229224,0.001531764,0.001259866,0.0008954779,0.0008468914],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005504418,0.001027557,0.0281509,0.0006325452,0.000161937,0.0005046742,0.002972294,0.003275783,0.8414207,0.0009190125,0.0002713661,0.1151589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005116852,0.01549173,0.5760413,0.0001208492,0.0005202171,0.002750493,0.002335933,0.0429179,0.3468499,0.008814645,0.003429567,0.000215821],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901592,0.000256635,0.006337056,0.00005367652,0.00002745375,0.0000690091,0.00003043772,0.00009640191,0.002970123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964863,0.00004982737,0.002913622,0.00002976665,0.000007656272,0.00002612049,0.0000329216,0.00002743237,0.0004263372],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003596934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01203293,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02367912171817592,"score_gpt":0.3950762960458897,"score_spread":0.3713971743277137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}