{"id":"W2014798815","doi":"10.1016/j.intmar.2009.02.009","title":"Personalization without Interrogation: Towards more Effective Interactions between Consumers and Feature-Based Recommendation Agents","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Personalization; Usability; Preference; Product (mathematics); Computer science; Feature (linguistics); Interrogation; Recommender system; Consumption (sociology); Data science; Risk analysis (engineering); Internet privacy; Human–computer interaction; Business; World Wide Web; Political science; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009263772,0.0009287268,0.0006976913,0.0006988861,0.001361259,0.003822427,0.001851861,0.004064492,0.005053442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03259508,0.0008980937,0.0005342287,0.0004903591,0.001848049,0.009745055,0.004064314,0.00290641,0.001925629],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006334031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001126036,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00220017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001861242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9916222,0.006365259,0.0002390574,0.0007748695,0.0007567663,0.0002419247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794431,0.01490226,0.001125487,0.002418454,0.001541094,0.000569633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001536688,0.003162507,0.03182893,0.0007506364,0.0002907701,0.001596051,0.1247122,0.01212787,0.07934864,0.07092854,0.01433369,0.6593835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001051894,0.001990564,0.02031177,0.0003933644,0.0006941398,0.002148759,0.04014527,0.5091226,0.0487469,0.184434,0.1903762,0.0005844775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2844175,0.0003812403,0.6674761,0.00519812,0.00007220674,0.0007930182,0.00005305225,0.003949684,0.03765909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6879733,0.000157045,0.303518,0.0009469782,0.0000603097,0.000428114,0.00009679944,0.000242285,0.006577191],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009263772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0489921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02269192276248532,"score_gpt":0.3095883802636206,"score_spread":0.2868964575011353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}