{"id":"W2014812608","doi":"10.1007/s10745-006-9097-y","title":"Sustainable Forestry and Local People: The Case of Hainan’s Li Minority","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Ecology","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sustainability; Government (linguistics); Sustainable development; Community forestry; Indigenous; China; Forestry; Business; Context (archaeology); Local government; Economic growth; Environmental planning; Political science; Forest management; Geography; Economics; Public administration; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001174763,0.0002339515,0.0002332637,0.0004944126,0.02219215,0.003374734,0.001405798,0.003715549,0.004885909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001030339,0.0002158549,0.0002408789,0.001041754,0.006891912,0.002035015,0.002692995,0.003566408,0.0001280835],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007454505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006480535,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.296082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6741384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992078,0.0001943958,0.000008488656,0.00003753903,0.00004420741,0.0005076108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991109,0.000221978,0.00008024788,0.00002421656,0.00004864366,0.0005140228],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003675061,0.0008911313,0.1258507,0.0001942857,0.0000982077,0.05817456,0.6348591,0.0008816334,0.001697553,0.1315873,0.0136378,0.03176011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004148003,0.0001157215,0.02804408,0.0001507761,0.00004758712,0.002716359,0.9183128,0.0006670311,0.0003682328,0.005271593,0.04422888,0.00003556776],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9686301,0.0003704239,0.00009143086,0.008743469,0.00004101101,0.00002188622,0.00001601145,0.000001999629,0.02208369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936347,0.000256254,0.00009536881,0.001212687,0.00001860404,0.00001609232,0.000008561708,0.000001925098,0.004755851],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.296082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5887172,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008083343919208856,"score_gpt":0.2136366015682886,"score_spread":0.2055532576490797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}