{"id":"W2014913039","doi":"10.1103/physreva.90.052314","title":"Loss-tolerant quantum cryptography with imperfect sources","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review A","topic":"Quantum Information and Cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":200,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science London","keywords":"Quantum key distribution; Exploit; Quantum cryptography; Computer science; Cryptography; Key (lock); Computer security; Imperfect; State (computer science); Quantum; Quantum information; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003030936,0.0002150074,0.0004001176,0.00009375183,0.0001259971,0.0001308391,0.0007142845,0.00001914935,0.00001786377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003192788,0.0001374978,0.0002883615,0.001014145,0.0001087445,0.0005344796,0.00008697488,0.0001653861,0.0002575453],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005920166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002535083,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006664819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.657043e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985772,0.0001138284,0.0002597152,0.0002959699,0.0004320958,0.0003211967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988137,0.0001188216,0.0001499114,0.0006480577,0.00009529866,0.0001741822],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000418824,0.00009792992,0.000515058,0.0004606749,0.00002385024,0.0000015316,0.0002200707,0.000008239325,0.00005831133,0.9661909,0.0007666039,0.03165267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001904103,0.002073484,0.01234656,0.004891872,0.0001923543,0.0001016138,0.00003715909,0.2038954,0.00160775,0.2382687,0.5326249,0.002056091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1570688,0.00672815,0.8212873,0.00282075,0.0001464775,0.0005571275,0.000001737431,0.0005492652,0.01084042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914185,0.001486377,0.002252533,0.004670804,0.00009820245,0.00005790176,0.000002487093,0.00001073991,0.000002489606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8343496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5606996,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007227432985447753,"score_gpt":0.2480888044874385,"score_spread":0.2408613715019907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}