{"id":"W2014964943","doi":"10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.004","title":"A structural equation modeling analysis of attentional control: an event-related fMRI study","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Brain Research","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Psychology; Attentional control; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Structural equation modeling; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Prefrontal cortex; Task (project management); Attention network; Lateralization of brain function; Neuroscience; Developmental psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006953699,0.0009893898,0.0006917815,0.0007148733,0.0008982359,0.001113798,0.001385526,0.001027355,0.002306515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02717505,0.000545148,0.001380403,0.0007203172,0.0006430286,0.00131749,0.0006928589,0.001986596,0.0002705973],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008694179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001453546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01731597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0118613,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980161,0.001375393,0.00006622957,0.0002825637,0.0001668737,0.00009278113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795325,0.01819101,0.0005999167,0.0009179544,0.0005566037,0.00020184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01559009,0.01860505,0.5574743,0.0005723313,0.005652288,0.002343056,0.01332709,0.07203366,0.08074325,0.05055529,0.004565824,0.1785379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001270648,0.002531879,0.3571781,0.00005058281,0.002463513,0.0007378745,0.001695722,0.608935,0.005221143,0.01809391,0.001690226,0.0001313958],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9858708,0.00007707085,0.01308735,0.0003105236,0.00001883215,0.00006186908,0.00008306963,0.00002794376,0.0004625545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889849,0.00007821021,0.009838668,0.00007843258,0.0000260218,0.0000894075,0.0002367142,0.0000322218,0.0006352869],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01731597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03677511,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4622122238997799,"score_gpt":0.5277693880993414,"score_spread":0.06555716419956148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}