{"id":"W2015010279","doi":"10.1007/s10912-009-9095-3","title":"Imagining Reproduction in Science and History","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Humanities","topic":"Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Royal University Hospital","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Reproduction; Discipline; Subject (documents); Humanism; The arts; Sociology; Human reproduction; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Object (grammar); Environmental ethics; Social science; Computer science; Ecology; Biology; Political science; Law; Library science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00293246,0.00009061502,0.0002363684,0.0002427677,0.0004204471,0.00005281639,0.0001941915,0.00003655369,0.0006176146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00104977,0.00007241956,0.00004217216,0.00005681526,0.001498922,0.000415956,0.00002530138,0.0003934042,0.000002594388],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007429038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000446513,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000217022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001969405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978922,0.00004363783,0.0004235324,0.0001926301,0.001233811,0.000214195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990515,0.00003883008,0.0001958693,0.0001053611,0.0004593957,0.0001491139],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004892179,0.000261295,0.0001110167,0.0001047604,0.00001910812,0.00006276464,0.6427609,7.321771e-7,0.00004589899,0.2032267,0.08132512,0.07203277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002575838,0.0002826086,0.0007562359,0.00006397791,0.00000928545,0.00006402148,0.05290624,0.000008609662,0.000006566805,0.002267969,0.9432867,0.00009022567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5365451,0.1454508,0.00002522336,0.07857691,0.01611875,0.0002849771,0.000001915476,0.0001019183,0.2228944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797761,0.005579286,0.00005860111,0.002918367,0.005874388,0.000001857682,3.033529e-7,0.000008679302,0.005782356],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8619615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6762447,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1014895670374947,"score_gpt":0.2940512838800019,"score_spread":0.1925617168425072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}