{"id":"W2015040553","doi":"10.1080/07011784.2013.801599","title":"Hazus: A standardized methodology for flood risk assessment in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques","topic":"Flood Risk Assessment and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Geological Survey of Canada","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Federal Emergency Management Agency; Public Safety Canada","keywords":"Risk assessment; Agency (philosophy); Flood myth; Government (linguistics); Natural hazard; Hazard; Risk management; Natural disaster; Variety (cybernetics); Environmental planning; Flooding (psychology); Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Emergency management; Environmental resource management; Engineering; Computer science; Geography; Political science; Environmental science; Computer security; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001944427,0.0004834283,0.0007035927,0.0004904494,0.0008958241,0.0004176444,0.0009592263,0.0001515674,0.00224127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002068793,0.0003875108,0.0001947058,0.0003264291,0.0002881339,0.0005514422,0.0001430653,0.0007470647,0.00003245498],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008589572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009380642,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9988073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952095,0.0007562286,0.000878348,0.0006828542,0.0002962606,0.002176846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970955,0.0002305602,0.0003124124,0.0004843984,0.0001069346,0.001770258],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001883199,0.0001157378,0.5875407,0.0002706555,0.0006773668,0.001707895,0.2622802,0.03741184,0.002264212,0.00002057681,0.006376601,0.1011458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001350201,0.0002758818,0.05886054,0.0001193551,0.0001020656,0.0002028097,0.003180269,0.004598761,0.0007354405,0.004582121,0.9252248,0.0007677021],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922811,0.0002707049,0.0006509083,0.002003514,0.000388044,0.001081288,0.0001082448,0.00002789066,0.003188324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862024,0.0003835077,0.01103424,0.0007097868,0.0002161987,0.0002741252,0.00003387016,0.00008312119,0.001062734],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9188483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998577,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01648480161517649,"score_gpt":0.2268210824988247,"score_spread":0.2103362808836482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}