{"id":"W2015195567","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.022","title":"A comparative study of optimal hybrid methods for wind power prediction in wind farm of Alberta, Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","topic":"Energy Load and Power Forecasting","field":"Engineering","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wind power; Artificial neural network; Particle swarm optimization; Imperialist competitive algorithm; Wind power forecasting; Time series; Hybrid power; Genetic algorithm; Electric power system; Engineering; Power (physics); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Multi-swarm optimization","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001138509,0.0005272067,0.0007090839,0.0007095527,0.0008664098,0.001635841,0.0009543707,0.0006775199,0.001055952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001906454,0.0003432694,0.0003935214,0.001045795,0.0003746392,0.0005890954,0.000283655,0.0004300612,0.0001437855],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00453942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005198361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8377072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8516997,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996045,0.00008432376,0.00002547549,0.00006727379,0.0001530633,0.00006535838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988914,0.0003966432,0.00003437096,0.00003575501,0.0005927642,0.00004903961],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006816083,0.00018269,0.0210405,0.0001765564,0.0001367574,0.00009146331,0.0001204001,0.9016615,0.001635272,0.001357846,0.001696263,0.07121926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003882961,0.0000543156,0.01425224,0.00001498867,0.00003888819,0.00001024821,0.0001494529,0.9838504,0.0007041511,0.0002601466,0.0006080625,0.00001826018],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9634826,0.001665697,0.02301475,0.0003811277,0.00008170202,0.00008396529,0.0005348294,0.0002929721,0.01046238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900995,0.0003454811,0.007106719,0.00002624638,0.00001228178,0.00001484794,0.0003818345,0.00002316743,0.001989849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1622928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3264971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01467074761912558,"score_gpt":0.2619024139922946,"score_spread":0.247231666373169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}