{"id":"W2015215117","doi":"10.1007/s11219-006-9218-2","title":"On evaluating the layout of UML diagrams for program comprehension","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Quality Journal","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Class diagram; Sequence diagram; Applications of UML; Story-driven modeling; UML tool; Computer science; Unified Modeling Language; Communication diagram; Programming language; Activity diagram; Software engineering; Flowchart; Readability; Class (philosophy); Program comprehension; Use Case Diagram; Object Constraint Language; Software; Software system; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005629472,0.00122735,0.0009110629,0.00356552,0.0007609914,0.002717255,0.001230009,0.001739749,0.005346701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1053745,0.0005318857,0.000618652,0.001971996,0.0007010027,0.005140231,0.00153458,0.0008492525,0.0008472698],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001253248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001596639,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007655989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01160658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992798,0.004285528,0.0004497195,0.0006435472,0.001580162,0.0002429421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8286266,0.1512587,0.004405402,0.004115639,0.01006254,0.001531212],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002528941,0.00126247,0.03957621,0.001091334,0.0001631147,0.0002317782,0.004312283,0.04492773,0.07201586,0.005085265,0.004218918,0.8245862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005493962,0.00448878,0.06599797,0.0003511683,0.0004613244,0.0004059875,0.004784008,0.8263161,0.0774894,0.01283993,0.006148449,0.0001675745],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6277957,0.0009175699,0.3576148,0.0004004426,0.00008516542,0.0004403395,0.0004310063,0.005814361,0.006500604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7412964,0.0004133077,0.2539076,0.00008045413,0.00003669525,0.0001457281,0.00135748,0.0007477857,0.002014533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007655989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0297718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08799721980182837,"score_gpt":0.4182070965023177,"score_spread":0.3302098767004893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}