{"id":"W2015215117","doi":"10.1007/s11219-006-9218-2","title":"On evaluating the layout of UML diagrams for program comprehension","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Quality Journal","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Class diagram; Sequence diagram; Applications of UML; Story-driven modeling; UML tool; Computer science; Unified Modeling Language; Communication diagram; Programming language; Activity diagram; Software engineering; Flowchart; Readability; Class (philosophy); Program comprehension; Use Case Diagram; Object Constraint Language; Software; Software system; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003686453,0.000152654,0.0002347833,0.0001040393,0.0003429907,0.0002416365,0.001020319,0.00007053191,0.000008183885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003896878,0.0001030492,0.0002043932,0.0003566206,0.00008425364,0.0001881759,0.0001512345,0.000442092,0.00000805231],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008575178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001451167,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004440283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006481721,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973589,0.0003424578,0.0005560108,0.0002563197,0.001056349,0.0004299933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933971,0.005144774,0.0002667953,0.0005750476,0.0005255062,0.00009078209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001339865,0.000735378,0.04905785,0.0002276393,0.00008165657,0.000009013556,0.0008028892,0.03548982,0.0007285386,0.03127603,0.004958478,0.8764987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004485864,0.006264903,0.6634488,0.0006544281,0.00005073468,0.0002100139,0.0001227296,0.1636031,0.002943901,0.1537294,0.003423954,0.001062135],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4195167,0.0001547773,0.578863,0.0004886228,0.0003502168,0.0003988319,0.000004403971,0.0002106423,0.00001282715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8164554,0.000002119008,0.183037,0.00007146276,0.0002739095,0.00005580355,0.000004587196,0.00001920056,0.00008046856],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8754366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4665208,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08799721980182837,"score_gpt":0.4182070965023177,"score_spread":0.3302098767004893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}