{"id":"W2015256886","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00262.x","title":"Leibniz on Compossibility","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; University of British Columbia; University of Cambridge; University of Rochester","keywords":"Sketch; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Relation (database); Possible world; Reading (process); Philosophy; Key (lock); Computer science; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001603407,0.0001812436,0.0002357511,0.0000870783,0.0005784543,0.0001086932,0.0003942576,0.00003275715,0.0005658991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002639169,0.0001479398,0.0001273823,0.00007521393,0.0003110978,0.0002120544,0.00002005838,0.0002311602,0.0009313687],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008432471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001734051,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001667517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007592723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986992,0.00005578893,0.0002516527,0.000362283,0.0003626039,0.0002685117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999203,0.00007632261,0.00006869582,0.0004168987,0.00008136399,0.0001537709],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000373799,0.0003107509,0.00001301952,0.00000456186,0.000004003179,0.000005428024,0.002064447,0.00001233951,0.00004384262,0.9893538,0.00653262,0.001617812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002354591,0.0004339697,0.0006749543,0.00001754373,0.000005965566,0.000001079137,0.00002191424,0.0001574803,0.00005244996,0.7897255,0.2084449,0.0002287718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0184398,0.00005585014,0.00003471892,0.01815055,0.0008668472,0.0001441477,0.00001870725,0.0002129319,0.9620764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928681,0.000001570736,0.00005025745,0.00455388,0.001767625,0.000004145747,0.000005603953,0.000007039987,0.0007418096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9744283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998465,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08290805364661388,"score_gpt":0.2547075996709275,"score_spread":0.1717995460243137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}