{"id":"W2015350636","doi":"10.1175/2007waf2006058.1","title":"Precipitation Regimes during Cold-Season Central U.S. Inverted Trough Cases. Part II: A Comparative Case Study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Weather and Forecasting","topic":"Climate variability and models","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Frontogenesis; Trough (economics); Climatology; Cold front; Precipitation; Extratropical cyclone; Cyclone (programming language); Synoptic scale meteorology; Geology; Warm front; Storm; Cyclogenesis; Precipitation types; Snow; Front (military); Winter storm; Atmospheric sciences; Meteorology; Mesoscale meteorology; Geography; Oceanography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000172443,0.0001479535,0.0001904825,0.00002058707,0.0007322809,0.00002304574,0.00005418627,0.00004213096,0.00020594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003963534,0.0001337171,0.00003826972,0.0001341641,0.0001423982,0.0002759849,0.0001237295,0.0001013348,0.000008641185],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009000691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000808901,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002193278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001058193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988798,0.00009105419,0.0002282384,0.0003393431,0.0001631117,0.0002984842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995492,0.0001053184,0.00008165992,0.0001425313,0.00001002077,0.0001113233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001835148,0.0009617193,0.8040941,0.00003330122,0.00006353165,0.001887864,0.1834705,0.005706992,0.001795469,0.00005394184,0.0003136455,0.001435391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01109372,0.00291922,0.5390799,0.0002279935,0.0003293758,0.02074632,0.08967649,0.3286031,0.002667057,0.0004219495,0.002035592,0.002199214],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996835,0.00003558597,0.00004152163,0.00001868411,0.00005674735,0.0004995787,0.00001053143,0.00004774482,0.002454589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990404,0.000009878967,0.0002917597,0.0000230464,0.00004151934,0.00003830126,0.000003850178,0.00001088626,0.0005404195],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3228962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5632187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0865451066433016,"score_gpt":0.2662435257096244,"score_spread":0.1796984190663228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}