{"id":"W2015373428","doi":"10.1017/s0272263100251061","title":"<b>ASPECTS OF ARGUMENT STRUCTURE ACQUISITION IN INUKTITUT.</b><i>Shanley E. M. Allen</i>. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1996. Pp. xvii + 248. $79.00cloth.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Second Language Acquisition","topic":"Speech and dialogue systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Variety (cybernetics); Linguistics; Language acquisition; Second-language acquisition; Theoretical linguistics; Cognitive science; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004916293,0.0003747744,0.0006526635,0.000343214,0.0001069027,0.00007180696,0.0006441904,0.0001894135,0.0009607102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003637703,0.0003557341,0.0001158549,0.000655731,0.0001521304,0.0007846389,0.0002415709,0.0002506248,0.00006891802],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003189949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006662398,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004933386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003995542,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971122,0.0002436565,0.0008195276,0.0007416243,0.0004921701,0.0005908859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986468,0.0001348142,0.0002462836,0.0007831322,0.00009500395,0.00009396449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001597497,0.003102249,0.01368598,0.004810541,0.001309759,0.00595429,0.4449236,0.003414012,0.179561,0.03904042,0.03224719,0.2703535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04210745,0.005794868,0.3287615,0.009010103,0.0002742956,0.001249319,0.08679283,0.005926024,0.3933085,0.09725508,0.02036389,0.009156222],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9646122,0.02450314,0.0002149798,0.0001700774,0.000906049,0.0006762787,0.0001219171,0.0001244013,0.008670979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966909,0.0004945272,0.001142233,0.0009454742,0.0003197941,0.00005937473,0.0001209206,0.00002257073,0.0002041735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3581308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999526,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01185468686854116,"score_gpt":0.2649874760078565,"score_spread":0.2531327891393154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}