{"id":"W2015401097","doi":"10.1103/physrevb.72.235420","title":"Determination of the atomic structure of scanning probe microscopy tungsten tips by field ion microscopy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review B","topic":"Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Field ion microscope; Materials science; Scanning probe microscopy; Tungsten; Scanning ion-conductance microscopy; Microscopy; Atomic units; Conductive atomic force microscopy; Atom probe; Nanotechnology; RADIUS; Apex (geometry); Atomic force acoustic microscopy; Kelvin probe force microscope; Characterization (materials science); Scanning capacitance microscopy; Resolution (logic); Atomic force microscopy; Optics; Ion; Scanning confocal electron microscopy; Physics; Magnetic force microscope; Geometry; Magnetic field","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005028439,0.0001399535,0.000297939,0.00001270733,0.00006519298,0.00001047102,0.0002889778,0.00002625028,0.00010291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006627307,0.00009920858,0.0001857341,0.0001840995,0.00007029883,0.00007512778,0.00007439707,0.0001523519,0.000005346775],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001935616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003084867,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006297335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001327675,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992229,0.00003089332,0.00030473,0.0001811762,0.0001145132,0.00014578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992147,0.00003903249,0.0003047967,0.0003423318,0.00006781022,0.00003133062],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002793539,0.00007138037,0.0007641029,0.0002390339,0.000008072897,5.67259e-9,0.00006641675,6.891625e-7,0.9739082,0.003516302,0.005109104,0.01631388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008938657,0.00003133993,0.00007924611,0.0008088257,0.0000539667,3.330941e-7,0.000007290545,0.0002076497,0.9789672,0.002580718,0.01707614,0.00009782623],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761671,0.00299756,0.01727448,0.001067582,0.00004539388,0.001185631,0.0002350828,0.00002825493,0.0009988862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946919,0.0001374833,0.004629571,0.0002339179,0.000103286,0.00003602846,0.00003211039,0.00001548976,0.0001201987],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01852479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4045608,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005629715079246762,"score_gpt":0.3114391306845569,"score_spread":0.3058094156053101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}