{"id":"W2015529899","doi":"10.1145/1229855.1229858","title":"A field evaluation of an adaptable two-interface design for feature-rich software","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction","topic":"Usability and User Interface Design","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Personalization; Computer science; Interface (matter); Human–computer interaction; Software; User interface; Adaptation (eye); User interface design; Word (group theory); Field (mathematics); Feature (linguistics); User experience design; World Wide Web; Operating system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002376524,0.0002928707,0.0003156625,0.0004114008,0.00036905,0.0001971067,0.001151606,0.0001704535,0.00008808121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001148895,0.0003077717,0.000192562,0.000394633,0.00003687595,0.001560492,0.00002789875,0.0004137228,0.00001731936],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003076285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000941136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001330972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002901953,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973803,0.0003419241,0.0005749585,0.0007145442,0.0005959626,0.0003923678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960525,0.001432935,0.0002699559,0.00129804,0.0008185885,0.0001280045],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008015853,0.001498986,0.00002178013,0.00006584892,0.0001880923,0.000002702881,0.002324061,0.2111926,0.009329415,0.0004764762,0.001196986,0.7729015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001813252,0.004682662,0.0003582733,0.000144655,0.0001234973,0.00004323573,0.0001300515,0.5566624,0.427959,0.007052594,0.0006024216,0.0004280093],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08566608,0.00002115576,0.910985,0.0002822505,0.001768521,0.0009503093,0.000009845172,0.0002594302,0.00005741147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6448694,9.75263e-7,0.3547296,0.0001339001,0.0001005508,0.00006384349,0.000008291659,0.00001810272,0.00007530349],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7724735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999374,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09646156343892542,"score_gpt":0.3748743440137637,"score_spread":0.2784127805748383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}