{"id":"W2015529899","doi":"10.1145/1229855.1229858","title":"A field evaluation of an adaptable two-interface design for feature-rich software","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction","topic":"Usability and User Interface Design","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Personalization; Computer science; Interface (matter); Human–computer interaction; Software; User interface; Adaptation (eye); User interface design; Word (group theory); Field (mathematics); Feature (linguistics); User experience design; World Wide Web; Operating system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01097115,0.00116283,0.0005718553,0.001165251,0.0005465661,0.0009751288,0.0017531,0.001346124,0.003149604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02289363,0.0004735639,0.0004853767,0.0005912205,0.0007552822,0.001595216,0.0009624697,0.000772751,0.0004159418],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009303426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007577318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001411819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001713972,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942328,0.003666305,0.0003963865,0.0005177236,0.0009775317,0.0002092384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756827,0.01673513,0.000767597,0.001930783,0.003941643,0.0009420674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01140606,0.03047699,0.0218634,0.004920454,0.0003417942,0.001614408,0.01710384,0.009057414,0.2686909,0.002463041,0.004934276,0.6271274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01715246,0.359176,0.1868886,0.001119531,0.001369281,0.00486303,0.01258724,0.06929883,0.2781456,0.003582021,0.06504491,0.0007724366],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.935585,0.000354747,0.05628271,0.0001813369,0.00006022396,0.004089348,0.0002117844,0.0005932444,0.002641454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8299176,0.000397273,0.1624059,0.0003412289,0.00005167607,0.002903524,0.0005122783,0.0001234271,0.003347202],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01097115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05802166,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09646156343892542,"score_gpt":0.3748743440137637,"score_spread":0.2784127805748383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}