{"id":"W2015576573","doi":"10.1177/1367006912452169","title":"Examining the contribution of metasyntactic ability to reading comprehension among native and non-native speakers of French","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Bilingualism","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Psychology; First language; Reading (process); Linguistics; Vocabulary; Multivariate analysis of variance; Variation (astronomy); Reading comprehension; Syntax; Set (abstract data type); Contrast (vision); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002026455,0.0001111382,0.0002924783,0.0002560854,0.0000361326,0.00001832245,0.0002325738,0.00005464967,0.00007093152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009692149,0.00007667753,0.00007687946,0.0001349752,0.000133231,0.0002159797,0.0000675447,0.0002145273,0.00000235239],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001118886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004618357,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002469122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006556009,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982582,0.0002494076,0.0007504146,0.0001226153,0.0004678759,0.0001514894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965729,0.001197727,0.0008896689,0.0001185638,0.001133727,0.00008740457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005393566,0.0004650082,0.7635071,0.00002314292,0.001437933,0.00003172804,0.1890079,0.0001390431,0.0258202,0.003861848,0.0004239005,0.01474285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008180641,0.0001793113,0.9779797,0.0002876361,0.00006741424,0.0001221776,0.004313826,0.00005557068,0.01498695,0.0004299788,0.000658166,0.0001011975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995244,0.0002390534,0.001403913,0.0002221891,0.001738977,0.000140541,0.00001183788,0.000003332608,0.0009962159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985479,0.00001020262,0.00107358,0.00007827794,0.0002105467,0.000002433392,0.000004308843,0.000007383084,0.00006536667],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2144726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3126819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03333011775301816,"score_gpt":0.3532816997382355,"score_spread":0.3199515819852174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}