{"id":"W2015576573","doi":"10.1177/1367006912452169","title":"Examining the contribution of metasyntactic ability to reading comprehension among native and non-native speakers of French","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Bilingualism","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Psychology; First language; Reading (process); Linguistics; Vocabulary; Multivariate analysis of variance; Variation (astronomy); Reading comprehension; Syntax; Set (abstract data type); Contrast (vision); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008173917,0.0003819322,0.0002735785,0.001144255,0.0002554924,0.0007666002,0.0001663042,0.0004033598,0.00156316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004100585,0.0001436033,0.0003564182,0.0002986868,0.0004310745,0.0004578156,0.0003437987,0.0002566888,0.0001834141],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002946991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002916836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01331721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01378201,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995659,0.0001041645,0.00004047687,0.0001186937,0.0000911025,0.00007961659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977674,0.001112808,0.0005711411,0.0001130067,0.0002734684,0.0001621214],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001264541,0.00006624715,0.9823928,0.00002998315,0.00006198112,0.000246297,0.003923815,0.00005873366,0.004399953,0.00004033254,0.00002802335,0.008625451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.731332e-7,0.0001213655,0.9985486,0.000002668749,0.00001162508,0.0002333517,0.0007108637,0.00006816714,0.0002191313,0.00001874881,0.00006145357,0.000003170715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.99965,0.00006959785,0.00004984128,0.000007800199,7.247577e-7,0.000001920601,0.00002461672,0.000002507003,0.0001929787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999737,0.00004315297,0.00004664463,0.000003081871,0.000001153376,0.000002521287,0.00003910589,9.920788e-7,0.0001262971],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01331721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02647942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03333011775301816,"score_gpt":0.3532816997382355,"score_spread":0.3199515819852174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}