{"id":"W2015886372","doi":"10.1145/2009916.2009943","title":"Enhancing ad-hoc relevance weighting using probability density estimation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Weighting; Relevance (law); Computer science; Scope (computer science); Independence (probability theory); Information retrieval; Probabilistic logic; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000607557,0.00008922593,0.00009745273,0.00005898988,0.0002218712,0.00008553261,0.0003251687,0.00004507111,0.00005722959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000164891,0.00007474772,0.00003986044,0.0003058819,0.00003236342,0.00158176,0.000175837,0.0001147064,0.00009777445],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008913026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008442265,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004442038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002087196,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989435,0.00004346191,0.0002878177,0.000206435,0.0002780397,0.0002407466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992236,0.00004665489,0.00009723496,0.0003436506,0.0002105721,0.00007831577],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008280637,0.0003887726,0.009290783,0.0002973369,0.00002373136,0.00003379026,0.02652656,0.0004659072,0.05402833,0.1983371,0.00007297142,0.7104519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000188771,0.00007590834,0.01302423,0.00003744847,0.000005471678,0.00002578939,0.00005784062,0.6881014,0.2874517,0.01064625,0.0001286008,0.0002565817],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4234381,0.000008039306,0.5749983,0.00002282582,0.0000943651,0.0001139692,1.571912e-7,0.0001375177,0.001186721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.503691,0.000001598598,0.4961569,0.00006300866,0.000006397972,0.000002352126,4.645028e-7,0.00000211807,0.00007619162],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7101954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3048124,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06501447717449269,"score_gpt":0.27587216229871,"score_spread":0.2108576851242173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}