{"id":"W2015952654","doi":"10.13031/2013.17662","title":"Application of SWAT to Meet Water Quality Requirements for Canadian Conditions-A Study in Grand River Watershed","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2004, Ottawa, Canada August 1 - 4, 2004","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Watershed; Soil and Water Assessment Tool; Tributary; SWAT model; Environmental science; Hydrology (agriculture); Watershed management; Water quality; Drainage basin; Water resource management; Sediment; Streamflow; Geography; Geology; Computer science; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005530522,0.0002383294,0.0003265563,0.0001462837,0.0003051292,0.0000134297,0.0003335615,0.00007836839,0.0004648381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002434654,0.0002038051,0.0000473578,0.0002420403,0.0001639069,0.0001967072,0.0001039521,0.00007307072,0.00006553599],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001259923,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9868492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989974,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978176,0.00007094823,0.000521748,0.0005193181,0.0003688738,0.0007015068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992321,0.00001957548,0.00008207843,0.0003872021,0.00002574217,0.0002533107],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001758228,0.0006922109,0.670802,0.00008864026,0.0002458236,0.0000756998,0.005631219,0.1523404,0.00262415,0.0006546132,0.1663536,0.0003158365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0124567,0.000819319,0.8405468,0.00005544533,0.0002683382,0.000004681756,0.002892823,0.0001094559,0.01106526,0.01146237,0.1185658,0.001752942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887911,0.00001258366,0.0008251743,0.003070585,0.0001909652,0.00246133,0.0001635229,0.00002327447,0.004461457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968373,0.000001018342,0.0002201144,0.001392785,0.00002002088,0.0003824151,0.0001079598,0.00002034446,0.001018019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1697449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.831093,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01512457386269104,"score_gpt":0.2583508475663621,"score_spread":0.2432262737036711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}