{"id":"W2016004402","doi":"10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.3","title":"The potential of exploiting DNA-repair defects for optimizing lung cancer treatment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology","topic":"DNA Repair Mechanisms","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Cancer Research; European Society for Medical Oncology; Institut National Du Cancer","keywords":"ERCC1; DNA repair; Medicine; Gemcitabine; Lung cancer; Synthetic lethality; DNA mismatch repair; Oncology; DNA damage; Cancer research; Chemotherapy; Cancer; Bioinformatics; DNA; Internal medicine; Nucleotide excision repair; Biology; Genetics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008431632,0.0009826944,0.001441015,0.001334967,0.000243052,0.001017892,0.001005752,0.001494837,0.002507728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007640091,0.0003005544,0.0005260397,0.001206753,0.0007042613,0.001213723,0.0007530862,0.002807802,0.001424406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007845964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007316916,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007939209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001998889,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997932,0.00003826052,0.00001677252,0.00003776979,0.00008579661,0.00002808537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996624,0.0001748679,0.00004318272,0.00001376081,0.00007913615,0.00002670225],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000127691,0.000123172,0.0002151928,0.008800363,0.0001002665,0.0002792642,0.00003635482,0.001011204,0.01267049,0.006487001,0.03058425,0.9395649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005109812,0.0001473623,0.0007120146,0.001341751,0.000137607,0.001395489,0.0000392881,0.0003590252,0.005051211,0.004762605,0.9859685,0.00003410656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001935276,0.9978197,0.0005101053,0.0004642055,0.0001771869,0.000004975698,0.00002126532,0.00001225719,0.0007967766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00169252,0.9965599,0.0005529612,0.0003399035,0.0001543599,0.000008132439,0.00004120551,0.000003350887,0.0006477186],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002507728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008389175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09933348595744591,"score_gpt":0.4743254553590213,"score_spread":0.3749919694015754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}