{"id":"W2016005933","doi":"10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.517","title":"Measurement equivalence: A comparison of methods based on confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Psychology","topic":"Psychometric Methodologies and Testing","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":412,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Equivalence (formal languages); Item response theory; Differential item functioning; Confirmatory factor analysis; Psychology; Raw score; Psychometrics; Factor analysis; Social psychology; Econometrics; Classical test theory; Test (biology); Statistics; Raw data; Mathematics; Structural equation modeling; Developmental psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2533992,0.002587471,0.003425288,0.01842771,0.001729009,0.005643495,0.003682692,0.002583069,0.003291898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5798608,0.001575937,0.002975835,0.01345731,0.006206943,0.01079559,0.007398331,0.004401159,0.001247103],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003852178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007515079,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003407026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003420797,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6418476,0.3011094,0.01051021,0.007335272,0.03807989,0.001117584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4947452,0.4271049,0.01618025,0.02479298,0.03542021,0.001756447],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001059433,0.0006244205,0.02535968,0.006162503,0.004011861,0.0002135359,0.006687079,0.005685774,0.001078497,0.1607889,0.009425433,0.7789028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001656466,0.00336962,0.09621309,0.00987167,0.003331885,0.002101942,0.00818832,0.0967858,0.004197635,0.7102599,0.0629157,0.001108019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.02033929,0.01927831,0.9398441,0.0029397,0.001099964,0.003091025,0.00043843,0.001132084,0.01183705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2157222,0.006435843,0.7682955,0.001044471,0.0004554919,0.006100015,0.0005951336,0.000479015,0.0008723782],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2533992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9206917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6434044207719166,"score_gpt":0.5717001743794533,"score_spread":0.07170424639246331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}