{"id":"W2016005933","doi":"10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.517","title":"Measurement equivalence: A comparison of methods based on confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Psychology","topic":"Psychometric Methodologies and Testing","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":412,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Equivalence (formal languages); Item response theory; Differential item functioning; Confirmatory factor analysis; Psychology; Raw score; Psychometrics; Factor analysis; Social psychology; Econometrics; Classical test theory; Test (biology); Statistics; Raw data; Mathematics; Structural equation modeling; Developmental psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0385383,0.0001922116,0.001183498,0.002615152,0.00008744744,0.00005117751,0.0007833327,0.0001700102,0.001150554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03244312,0.0001281509,0.0003137228,0.002844883,0.0002551111,0.00005717363,0.00004832941,0.0004371156,0.000009820699],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004177116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003398682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":7.547217e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.106423e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922427,0.00370199,0.00189931,0.0004136928,0.001459216,0.0002830701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.957559,0.0387877,0.002269196,0.0006443436,0.0005597621,0.0001799265],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01008186,0.0008877653,0.08668891,0.00002006452,0.0009100575,0.00001794438,0.002006848,0.001127247,0.05557378,0.001198253,0.005162079,0.8363252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003942546,0.002532304,0.9404571,0.00006187383,0.0005650013,0.00004753279,0.00223014,0.01195533,0.006946917,0.01742044,0.01342602,0.0004147695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5372857,0.001386397,0.4512395,0.0006372011,0.0005815176,0.0001423063,0.000006348503,0.00001298427,0.008707982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9218976,0.00003334954,0.07744216,0.0005515445,0.00004208385,0.000002598451,6.764886e-8,0.000008281786,0.00002234548],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8537682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6434044207719166,"score_gpt":0.5717001743794533,"score_spread":0.07170424639246331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}