{"id":"W2016032690","doi":"10.1016/j.mrgentox.2008.09.004","title":"Regulatory aspects of genotoxicity testing: from hazard identification to risk assessment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis","topic":"Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Hazard analysis; Identification (biology); Genotoxicity; Risk assessment; Hazard; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Business; Computer science; Biology; Reliability engineering; Medicine; Computer security; Toxicity; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005729892,0.0002043488,0.000239007,0.0001807103,0.0004715867,0.00002005815,0.0002153242,0.0002208724,0.00008106467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001652761,0.0002228995,0.00007474796,0.0002046534,0.0005298764,0.000009258558,0.0002876243,0.0001712297,0.00001869603],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001341591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000188204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001373099,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99749,0.0004931304,0.0004423763,0.0007067594,0.0004915604,0.0003761497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988937,0.0001331523,0.0001700452,0.0005041457,0.00006752509,0.0002314233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008103652,0.0002321748,0.1113108,0.00001080899,0.00008187869,0.00002540245,0.0001962879,0.001770488,0.8779383,0.00001722908,0.0001318401,0.008203833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003503425,0.0005473461,0.6416413,0.00000425936,0.00002474984,0.0000280264,0.0002351916,0.0003921875,0.3561611,0.0001981415,0.0002740366,0.0001432828],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946279,0.0004766979,0.003526618,0.0001079634,0.00008759923,0.0006505076,0.0002647899,0.00001207187,0.0002458747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931304,0.0004160482,0.005681669,0.0001140301,0.000111229,0.0001388243,0.0001833656,0.00003089137,0.0001935854],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5303306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9089578,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0320488578822891,"score_gpt":0.300790372441017,"score_spread":0.2687415145587279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}