{"id":"W2016053849","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2008.04.001","title":"An examination of the peer review process in accounting journals","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Accounting Education","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Academic Accounting Association; James Madison University","keywords":"Peer review; Misconduct; Process (computing); Accounting; Academic integrity; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Perception; Public relations; Political science; Business; Computer science; Social psychology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02452001,0.0001009875,0.0003055693,0.0005580011,0.0002140291,0.0001697419,0.0009847864,0.00009109973,0.0001263505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03740746,0.00006343035,0.0001067117,0.001971013,0.00008140467,0.002447049,0.00002903685,0.0004939208,0.00000544657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001106356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002041573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003085333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002138764,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945408,0.0003371798,0.001645409,0.0001643697,0.003167691,0.0001445835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811475,0.0007703805,0.003737591,0.0004053949,0.01389289,0.00004626534],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001685586,0.0009937247,0.8316467,0.0005343749,0.00001315826,0.000001316096,0.01713479,0.0008345951,0.00223586,0.0004408252,0.01707211,0.1290757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001030261,0.00001696995,0.984023,0.002391779,0.00001860797,0.0001576564,0.003793016,0.00009387589,0.0004561569,0.007567491,0.001299253,0.00007913986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847625,0.002607731,0.000121643,0.009278903,0.002079384,0.0001331898,5.410117e-7,0.000002788973,0.00101328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968687,0.0010669,0.0005297501,0.0006110229,0.0006734466,0.000003953526,0.000001140216,0.000009767215,0.0002353171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1523763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9707009,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2492867926487362,"score_gpt":0.4965574609747014,"score_spread":0.2472706683259652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}