{"id":"W2016053849","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2008.04.001","title":"An examination of the peer review process in accounting journals","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Accounting Education","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Academic Accounting Association; James Madison University","keywords":"Peer review; Misconduct; Process (computing); Accounting; Academic integrity; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Perception; Public relations; Political science; Business; Computer science; Social psychology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1299057,0.0003471177,0.0005636635,0.009580153,0.008036874,0.01282814,0.002874065,0.003831692,0.006330326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.605234,0.0004664818,0.0007724752,0.007372526,0.004928229,0.008001192,0.003147764,0.002400045,0.001271317],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006624762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01760413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008341496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01011501,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8263801,0.1067424,0.008981775,0.003662417,0.04984489,0.004388473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1498404,0.6921642,0.04119451,0.01634959,0.0953326,0.005118648],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001969703,0.00136224,0.2152387,0.001609991,0.0002706048,0.00177851,0.09819531,0.003714182,0.004075443,0.1840578,0.02771441,0.4600131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003820044,0.002713493,0.6382943,0.001861733,0.0003893104,0.002180516,0.07433734,0.01812042,0.006591723,0.07839099,0.1761474,0.0005907309],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7428155,0.004967084,0.01747673,0.02554035,0.0007601313,0.001428658,0.0003533653,0.0004592645,0.206199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806085,0.000912153,0.006844957,0.0009135015,0.0004475488,0.0002351832,0.0001156782,0.00008142145,0.00984093],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8700944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.687015,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2492867926487362,"score_gpt":0.4965574609747014,"score_spread":0.2472706683259652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}