{"id":"W2016299742","doi":"10.1016/s0022-1694(00)00236-5","title":"Field and modeling evidence for a “stagnant flow” zone in the upper meter of sandy phreatic aquifers","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrology","topic":"Groundwater flow and contamination studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs; University of Waterloo; University of New Brunswick; University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Aquifer; Geology; Groundwater; Plume; Groundwater flow; Groundwater model; Phreatic; Vadose zone; Hydrology (agriculture); Aquifer test; TRACER; Hydraulic conductivity; Borehole; Piezometer; Groundwater discharge; MODFLOW; Geomorphology; Soil science; Groundwater recharge; Geotechnical engineering; Soil water","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002898498,0.00009821734,0.00009991297,0.0002580266,0.0002376582,0.0003332667,0.0002675859,0.0002245324,0.0009227119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006598853,0.0001460684,0.0001141465,0.0002996955,0.0006191676,0.0003507197,0.000153586,0.0001365191,0.00006204949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005799236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003874226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03735848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04409384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999304,0.00001962029,0.000006150209,0.00001938357,0.00001225326,0.00001209135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995875,0.0001863379,0.00006709375,0.00003195982,0.00008952145,0.00003769337],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00110763,0.000900595,0.8222154,0.0001125549,0.00004489729,0.0004882688,0.001325103,0.05666418,0.09372982,0.003075698,0.0008874396,0.01944843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008304848,0.0003457688,0.8926294,0.00001054278,0.00003930238,0.00009266645,0.0008028619,0.09420682,0.01044112,0.000764364,0.0005598897,0.00002415265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994224,0.000004049984,0.0001850247,0.00001497214,4.393771e-7,0.000002635219,0.00004299605,0.000009469041,0.0003179997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997872,0.00000391906,0.0001208186,0.000001536731,3.22647e-7,0.000001050191,0.00003130645,6.240138e-7,0.00005332243],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03735848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07428205,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03587894875490468,"score_gpt":0.2823519265924174,"score_spread":0.2464729778375127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}